<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Atomic Show #091 - Alexandra Prokopenko journalist and blogger at Atom Watch Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atomic.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/04/28/the-atomic-show-091-alexandra-prokopenko-journalist-and-blogger-at-atom-watch-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atomic.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/04/28/the-atomic-show-091-alexandra-prokopenko-journalist-and-blogger-at-atom-watch-blog/</link>
	<description>A show about atomic energy</description>
	<pubDate>Mon,  8 Sep 2008 15:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: simon filiatrault</title>
		<link>http://atomic.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/04/28/the-atomic-show-091-alexandra-prokopenko-journalist-and-blogger-at-atom-watch-blog/#comment-69525</link>
		<dc:creator>simon filiatrault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 01:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atomic.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/04/28/the-atomic-show-091-alexandra-prokopenko-journalist-and-blogger-at-atom-watch-blog/#comment-69525</guid>
		<description>great show Rod... I was reading this today: 
http://technology.newscientist.com/channel/tech/mg19826514.200-nuclear-superfuel-gets-too-hot-to-handle.html
would love to ear your thoughts on this... maybe a show with the host of this week in nuclear would be nice.  Read the comments on this page they are quite good.

quotes:
They say that fuels with a burn-up above 45 GWd/tU cause previously unforeseen safety problems, and would break existing NRC safety rules unless changes are made to the way fuel elements are packaged.

The danger would come if there were a sudden loss of cooling water - as in the accident that led to the partial meltdown of a reactor core at Three Mile Island,

Simon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great show Rod&#8230; I was reading this today:<br />
<a href="http://technology.newscientist.com/channel/tech/mg19826514.200-nuclear-superfuel-gets-too-hot-to-handle.html" rel="nofollow">http://technology.newscientist.com/channel/tech/mg19826514.200-nuclear-superfuel-gets-too-hot-to-handle.html</a><br />
would love to ear your thoughts on this&#8230; maybe a show with the host of this week in nuclear would be nice.  Read the comments on this page they are quite good.</p>
<p>quotes:<br />
They say that fuels with a burn-up above 45 GWd/tU cause previously unforeseen safety problems, and would break existing NRC safety rules unless changes are made to the way fuel elements are packaged.</p>
<p>The danger would come if there were a sudden loss of cooling water - as in the accident that led to the partial meltdown of a reactor core at Three Mile Island,</p>
<p>Simon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R Margolis</title>
		<link>http://atomic.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/04/28/the-atomic-show-091-alexandra-prokopenko-journalist-and-blogger-at-atom-watch-blog/#comment-68856</link>
		<dc:creator>R Margolis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atomic.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/04/28/the-atomic-show-091-alexandra-prokopenko-journalist-and-blogger-at-atom-watch-blog/#comment-68856</guid>
		<description>Great podcast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great podcast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
